Tuesday, August 22, 2006
NL50 Full-ring datamining results or how to reach >8PTBB/100, Part 3, graphs
In this part I present some graphical results of all 34 players with more than 2000 hands. Players 1-20 are winners, players 21-34 are losers.
Conclusion: VPIP should be between 15% and 28%, no real correlation visible
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher number of steal attempts, something like 15-30%.
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher medium aggression number. The average value of the aggression is 2.21+/- 1.12 for the winning players with >2k hands and 1.65+/-0.81 for the losing players with >2k hands.
Conclusion: The continuation bet number is calculated as how often you bet instead of check (1 means equal numbers of bet and check). The bad players else bet too often or not often enough after a preflop raise. Best numbers 2.5-6
Conclusions: The winning players CR a little bit more often than the losers.
Conclusion: VPIP should be between 15% and 28%, no real correlation visible
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher number of steal attempts, something like 15-30%.
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher medium aggression number. The average value of the aggression is 2.21+/- 1.12 for the winning players with >2k hands and 1.65+/-0.81 for the losing players with >2k hands.
Conclusion: The continuation bet number is calculated as how often you bet instead of check (1 means equal numbers of bet and check). The bad players else bet too often or not often enough after a preflop raise. Best numbers 2.5-6
Conclusions: The winning players CR a little bit more often than the losers.
Comments:
<< Home
Interesting, though on some of them it is difficult to distinguish the lengths of the dark purple bars representing the stats.
Would it be possible to see the average and standard error of the aggression (from graph 3)?
Ian (Hand History Exchange)
Would it be possible to see the average and standard error of the aggression (from graph 3)?
Ian (Hand History Exchange)
The average value of the aggression is 2.21+/- 1.12 for the winning players with >2k hands and 1.65+/-0.81 for the losing players.
I thought so - among high-volume players, it looks like aggression is the best determinant of long-term winner vs long-term loser, and within reason, the more aggressive the better.
Post a Comment
<< Home
